|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Thesis Eleven, Vol. 76, No. 1,
29-48 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0725513604040260
Civilization and State Formation in the Islamic Context: Re-Reading Ibn Khald n
Johann P. Arnason
La Trobe UniversityJ.Arnason{at}latrobe.edu.au
Georg Stauth
University of Bielefeld;Institute of Advanced Studies in the Humanities in EssenGStauth{at}t-online.de
Ibn KhaldØuns theory of history has been extensively discussed and interpreted in widely divergent ways by Western scholars. In the context of present debates, it seems most appropriate to read his work as an original and comprehensive version of civilizational analysis (the key concept of umran is crucial to this line of interpretation), and to reconstruct his model in terms of relations between religious, political and economic dimensions of the human condition. A specific relationship between state formation and the broader context of civilizational processes appears as the most central theme. This civilizational approach is then contrasted with the most influential recent Western interpretation, put forward by Ernest Gellner. Gellner translates Ibn KhaldØuns analysis into functionalist terms and thus tones down its historical and civilizational specificity. The consequences are most obvious when it comes to discussing the unity and diversity of the Islamic world, especially with regard to the Ottoman Empire.
Key Words: civilization Ibn KhaldØun Islam nomadism state formation

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. H. Zaidi
Muslim Reconstructions of Knowledge and the Re-enchantment of Modernity
Theory Culture Society,
September 1, 2006;
23(5):
69 - 91.
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|